Rights of the Criminally Accused Essay - 593 Words

Everyone in the United States have specific rights when they are criminally accused. â€Å"I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.† This quote was from Thomas Jefferson. Trial by jury goes along with everyone having rights when they are accused, it is one of the basic things in the bill of rights, that when you are accused, you have the right to a trial by jury. There are many other rights as well. I had already known some things about this topic. Other stuff was new knowledge to me. Something that I already knew was that when you are being arrested, the officer arresting you has to read you your rights as an American. I also knew that†¦show more content†¦One specific case would be Gideon Vs. Wainwright in 1962. In this case Clarence Earl Gideon was convicted and didn’t have enough money to obtain a lawyer. He asked for an Attorney, but he didnâ€⠄¢t get one because the court denied his request. They considered the question if this violated Gideon’s right, so they unanimously decided that Gideon should be appointed an Attorney, and he was given one. This case is an example of the Sixth Amendment right of getting an Attorney if you cannot afford one (â€Å"Rights of the Accused†, np). The Criminally Accused are given a public trial to discourage the abuse of prosecutorial power. If you weren’t given a public trial you could be put to death, and no one would even know why. That is also the reason that you have a trial by jury. They determine if you are guilty or not guilty by the evidence presented at trial. They also have the power to acquit an accused if it believes that he is accused of violation an unjust law (Hornberger, np). When you are arrested, if you aren’t given you Miranda Rights, then questioning after an arrest, can be inadmissible at trial (â€Å"Advisement of Rights†, np). That is part of what Due Process is. Due Process is the right that you have to be given all of your rights and the court has to execute all of your rights before you can be punished. Another right is no cruel or unusualShow MoreRelatedComparing The Morgentaler Case Of 1993 And The Smolig And Scott Case887 Words   |  4 Pages287 of the criminal code infringed the rights of section 7 in the charter of rights and freedoms. Section 7 states that â€Å"Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.† (Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982) This declared that abortion could ne longer be considered a criminal offence because it was unconstitutional and violated one’s rights under se ction 7. The oakes test wouldRead MoreThe Criminal Code Of Canada1431 Words   |  6 PagesArshdeep Kaur 212127767 †¨Ã¢â‚¬ ¨ Not Criminally Responsible on account of Mental Disorder (NCRMD) is a legal defence by excuse mostly used in countries such as Australia and Canada. It is well stipulated in criminal laws of such countries where a defendant may argue that they should not be held criminally responsible for breaking the law on the grounds that they are were mentally ill at the time when they committed the criminal offence  (Penney, 2013). The issue of NCRMD may only arise on the followingRead MoreThe Shortcomings Of The Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders ( Dsm )3204 Words   |  13 Pagesallows them to attain the counselling and treatment they require. Before a verdict can be rendered, the courts administer a rigorous test and ensure that those individuals who gain the benefit of this defence truly deserve it. The defence of not criminally responsible remains very pertinent in today’s society simply because society recognizes a need to differentiate a true c riminal from one who does not intend the consequences of his or her actions. However, there are many misconceptions and issuesRead MoreCase Brief Essay666 Words   |  3 Pagescase back to the trial court because Koppersmith was denied the right to testify about his intentions. He went to retrial and was convicted of reckless manslaughter and sentenced to twenty years in prison. He appealed this conviction to the Alabama Court of Appeals on the grounds that the jury was not given instructions on criminally negligent homicide. Issue: * Is there error in the court denying a jury instructions on criminally negligent homicide, instead instructing on reckless manslaughterRead MoreThe Warren Court And The Criminal Justice Revolution Of The 1960 S1605 Words   |  7 Pageshas become the shorthand for a jurisprudential shift from state toward federal authority; the Warren Court offered an expansive understanding of the role federal courts could play in enabling access for a host of new claimants seeking an array of rights† (Resnik 2012). Earl Warren’s court and jurisprudence is best known for cases on expansion of federal habeas corpus, expansion on the law of criminal procedure, expansion on free expression and exercise of religion, and desegregation public schoolsRead MoreFair Trial Advantages1242 Words   |  5 PagesINTRODUCTION: The right to a fair trial is one of the fundamental guarantees of human rights and the rule of law, aimed at ensuring the proper administration of justice. It comprises various interrelated attributes and is often linked to the enjoyment of other rights, such as the right to life and liberty and the prohibition against torture and other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. All persons must have equal rights of access to the courts and tribunals, including accessRead MoreShould Children Be Charged With Their Crimes1648 Words   |  7 Pagessystem. The judicial system ensures that children be punished for their crimes and that the court is also made certain that the child has the same rights as an adult. Although they are sentenced fairly, imprisonment seems to have a lesser effect on the offender than community service. The judges are also likely to prioritise helping and rehabilitating the accused, not just punishing them (Bowen, 1994, p117). From studies completed i.e. studies completed in 2013, found that juveniles are three times moreRead MoreCrimianl Justice1307 Words   |  6 PagesProvide an example of the exclusionary rule. A right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures is declared by the Fourth Amendment, but how one is to translate the guarantee into concrete terms is not specified. Several possible methods of enforcement have been suggested over time; however, the Supreme Court has settled, not without dissent, on only one as an effective means to make real the right. An example would be if a police officer stops a driver for speeding, and in the courseRead MoreThe Insanity Plea Essay1134 Words   |  5 Pagescriminal justice system has the concept of state of mind. In order for a person to be held criminally liable in the courts eyes, they say, he or she must have criminal intent or awareness of the wrongfulness of the act. If a person claims to be mentally ill and unable to tell the difference between right and wrong, for example, then they cant be held criminally responsible in our society. Most individuals accused of crime lack psychological sophistication. An important sign of a manipulative effortRead MoreNursing Liability As A Nurse978 Words   |  4 Pagesnursing staff shortages, the risk of liability increases. Nurses â€Å"has a duty to do or promote good, to prevent harm, and to remove evil or harm† (Burkhardt and Nathaniel, 2007, pg. 159). The three nurses at the Centura St. Anthony Hospital were accused of criminally negligen t homicide in the death of newborn by a grand jury in Colorado. This essay will first discuss the emotions felt by the Colorado Board of Nursing in the case held against the three nurses. Second, this essay will whether or not the nurses